2026-01-26 / slot 2 / DECISION

Decision Log: Benchmark Readiness for Self-Recognition Evolve, Retrieval Guardrails, and Knowledge Pack Expansion (2026-01-26, Slot 2)

Decision Log: Benchmark Readiness for Self-Recognition Evolve, Retrieval Guardrails, and Knowledge Pack Expansion (2026-01-26, Slot 2)

Context#

Recent work focused on hardening the self-recognition evolve pipeline, curbing excessive retrieval, expanding domain-specific knowledge resources, and readying the system for more rigorous evaluation. Parallel efforts improved authentication, proxy/usage handling, pricing/plan APIs, and administrative surfaces. A daily reorganize routine using an NDC-based taxonomy was introduced to reveal knowledge biases and keep the corpus balanced.

What changed#

  • Self-recognition evolve
  • Iterative improvements across knowledge-pack integration and a multi-agent “universe” sampling environment.
  • Unification efforts between diagnostic flows and the code-oriented self-recognition mode.
  • A CI workflow was added to automate evolve runs aligned with the desire pipeline.
  • Timeouts were extended to stabilize longer-running trials; parallel execution was explored and flagged for further testing.
  • Retrieval guardrails
  • Guardrails were introduced to address “too many retrievals,” with constraints aimed at reducing fan-out and improving determinism.
  • Desire defaults
  • The desire component now defaults to reading all relevant entries, simplifying configuration and ensuring broader coverage during evolve runs.
  • Knowledge pack expansion
  • Multiple new packs were added around mirror self-recognition (MSR) and adjacent domains, including:
  • Ethics and compliance frameworks for animal-based MSR studies.
  • Historical evolution and cultural significance of mirrors.
  • Industrial optics fundamentals, including mirror coating and apparatus design considerations for MSR setups.
  • Cross-species self-awareness indicators and comparative syntheses of non-MSR approaches.
  • The catalog and assignments were updated to reflect the expanded scope.
  • Non-technical “universe” samples
  • Expanded sample agents for foundational non-technical knowledge integration spanning ethics, creativity, leadership, culture/cross-culture, emotional and epistemic reasoning, learning, personal development, and orchestration/root aggregation.
  • Platform and product surfaces
  • Authentication for command-line workflows was refined.
  • AI proxy handling and usage tracking cores were updated for stability and clearer accounting.
  • Pricing and plan logic were refined; user-facing APIs around plans and profiles received updates.
  • Administrative dashboards were adjusted to reflect recent product directions.
  • Reorganize and data hygiene
  • A daily reorganize job was introduced, leveraging an NDC-based taxonomy to surface knowledge imbalance and guide content curation.
  • JSON formatting conventions were standardized to reduce merge conflicts.

Decisions#

  • Continue evolving self-recognition with integrated knowledge packs and multi-agent sampling; keep extended timeouts while validating parallel execution.
  • Enforce retrieval guardrails to limit fan-out; treat configuration as tunable and monitor for regressions.
  • Keep desire’s read-all-by-default setting to maximize signal during evolve cycles.
  • Prioritize knowledge pack domains tied to MSR: ethics/compliance, historical context, industrial optics, and cross-species indicators.
  • Maintain the daily reorganize routine to identify and mitigate knowledge bias via an NDC-aligned taxonomy.
  • Proceed with unification of diagnostic and code-oriented self-recognition commands.
  • Keep the automated evolve workflow in CI to standardize evaluation cadence.
  • Finalize updates across authentication, proxy, usage accounting, pricing/plans, and administrative surfaces for enterprise readiness.

Benchmark readiness focus#

Without adopting external datasets or benchmarks, readiness will be assessed via internal criteria:

  • Evolve stability: completion rate, timeout incidence, and failure modes before/after guardrails.
  • Retrieval discipline: average retrieval count per task, tail behavior, and impact on output quality.
  • Knowledge coverage: topic distribution against the NDC-based taxonomy; detection and remediation of domain imbalance.
  • Orchestration performance: latency and determinism across multi-agent sampling flows.
  • Platform health: authentication success rates, proxy/usage error budgets, and API response health for pricing/plans and profiles.

Risks and mitigations#

  • Over-throttling retrieval may degrade answer quality.
  • Mitigation: expose guardrail knobs, monitor quality regressions, iterate thresholds.
  • Parallelism can surface race conditions and flakiness.
  • Mitigation: keep timeouts conservative, expand test coverage, stage rollouts.
  • Knowledge pack sprawl increases maintenance overhead.
  • Mitigation: enforce curation via the daily reorganize routine and taxonomy checks.
  • Ethics/compliance scope creep without clear boundaries.
  • Mitigation: codify inclusion criteria and document jurisdiction-aware considerations within packs.

Next steps#

  • Validate parallel execution paths under extended timeouts; add targeted test cases.
  • Tune retrieval guardrails with real workloads; add observability for fan-out and quality impact.
  • Continue enriching MSR-adjacent knowledge packs with curated, taxonomy-checked content.
  • Expand non-technical agent samples to cover remaining reasoning facets and collaboration patterns.
  • Operationalize the CI evolve workflow on a predictable schedule and publish run summaries.
  • Monitor authentication, proxy, usage, and plan/pricing endpoints for error budgets and latency.
  • Iterate the reorganize job to flag high-variance domains and suggest targeted content acquisition.